网络直播打赏作为新兴经济行为,通过虚拟礼物赠送主播,可能对夫妻共同财产产生重大影响。本文分析了打赏人与被打赏人、平台公司之间的法律关系,指出“赠与合同说”忽视对价属性,“服务合同说”难以适用,且“无合同关系”说未能解释财产流转逻辑。未经同意的高额打赏通常被认定为重大财产支出无效。平台作为中介负有监管义务,若未履行责任,可能承担连带责任。本文建议设立冷静期与追认机制,明确财产返还与债务分担规则,完善法律法规并强化行业监管,规范直播经济,平衡家庭财产权益与网络经济发展需求。Online live streaming rewards, as an emerging economic behavior involving the gifting of virtual items to streamers, can have a significant impact on marital common property. This article analyzes the legal relationships among the rewarder, the rewarded, and the platform company, pointing out that the “gift contract theory” overlooks the consideration attribute, the “service contract theory” is difficult to apply, and the “no contract relationship theory” fails to explain the logic of property transfer. High-value rewards without consent are usually deemed invalid as significant property expenditures. As an intermediary, the platform bears regulatory obligations, and if it fails to fulfill its responsibilities, it may bear joint and several liability. This article suggests establishing a cooling-off period and a ratification mechanism, clarifying rules for property restitution and debt apportionment, improving laws and regulations, and strengthening industry supervision to regulate the live streaming economy and balance the needs of family property rights and the development of the online economy.
随着数字化技术的高速发展,电子商务在全球范围内迅速崛起,成为经济活动的重要组成部分。电子合同作为电子商务交易的核心内容,对电子合同法律效力与证据认定问题的研究具有重大的法律意义。本文旨在探讨电子商务法中电子合同的法律效力中所涉及的电子证据认定问题,目前我国司法实践中对于电子证据的适用仍存在很多争议,由于电子证据本身所存在的无形性、易于篡改等特点,实践中存在着电子证据不充分,采信度不高,证据认定困难等困境。本文从证据的理论及特征出发,找寻电子证据的核心概念,提出应该规范电子数据原件认定、扩大证据主体的范围、优化公证流程等有效措施,以期为电子商务的健康发展提供法律保障,推动司法实践工作的顺利进行,提高当事人对于电子证据效用的信任度。With the rapid development of digital technology, electronic commerce has surged globally and become an essential component of economic activities. Electronic contracts, as the core of electronic commerce transactions, carry significant legal implications for the normal development of electronic transactions concerning their legal effectiveness and evidence identification. This paper aims to explore the issues related to the identification of electronic evidence in the legal effectiveness of electronic contracts within the framework of electronic commerce law. Currently, there are numerous disputes regarding the application of electronic evidence in China’s judicial practice. Due to the inherent characteristics of electronic evidence, such as invisibility and susceptibility to tampering, difficulties arise in practice, including inadequate electronic evidence, low credibility, and challenges in evidence identification. Starting from the theory and characteristics of evidence, this paper seeks to define the core concept of electronic evidence and proposes effective measures, such as standardizing the i
