随着经济全球化的不断深入,供应链立法成为世界各国特别是欧美发达国家增强经济战略自主、输出供应链治理观、推动经济可持续性发展的重要手段。欧盟最新的供应链立法成果《公司可持续性尽职指令提案》意欲通过管辖权的技术性扩张,实现供应链立法的“布鲁塞尔效应”,进而推动域外效力的实现。同时欧盟供应链立法域外条款与成员国内部、第三国管辖之间引发的冲突也为其落地实施带来不确定性。因此,欧盟供应链立法对我国而言既有挑战,也有启发,我国需要对欧盟在输出供应链价值观与标准带来的挑战予以积极回应,也可以借鉴欧盟应对供应链风险的有益经验完善供应链立法,为实现我国供应链可持续发展提供有力的法治保障。With the deepening of economic globalization, supply chain legislation has become crucial for nations worldwide, particularly developed economies in Europe and America, to enhance economic strategic autonomy, export governance paradigms for supply chains, and promote sustainable economic development. The European Union’s latest legislative achievement in this domain, the Proposal for a Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence, seeks to realize the “Brussels Effect” in supply chain governance through technical expansion of jurisdictional parameters, thereby advancing the extraterritorial effect of its legislation. However, uncertainties persist in implementation due to jurisdictional conflicts arising between the extraterritorial provisions in EU supply chain legislation, member states’ domestic jurisdictions, and third-country legal systems. Consequently, while presenting challenges, the EU’s legislative approach also offers valuable insights for China. It necessitates proactive responses to challenges posed by EU’s exportation of supply chain values and standards, while simultaneously drawing lessons from the EU’s experience in addressing supply chain risk
